Incident Period: Over the last one week
Impact: Brief degraded performance for a few seconds during high-load periods
Current Status: Stable – no degradation observed in the last 72 hours
During the past week, the database experienced short intervals of degraded performance. The degradation was caused by a combination of application-level inefficiencies and sudden load spikes from customer activity, which collectively pushed the database beyond its scaling thresholds.
* The auditing service was generating excessive database queries.
* Lack of proper batching and query optimization caused unnecessary DB load.
* The archival microservice attempted to process and archive very large volumes of historical test run data at once.
* This created long-running transactions and high I/O consumption.
* A few customers generated unusually heavy workloads in a short span of time.
* This compounded the load already caused by the auditing and archival services.
* The database autoscaling mechanism did not get sufficient time to react to the sudden spike.
* This led to short bursts of unhandled load before stabilization.
* Auditing service queries were optimized to reduce redundant load.
* Archival microservice was redesigned to archive data in smaller, controlled batches.
* Some high-volume customers were migrated to new infrastructure with isolated database clusters.
* This reduces the risk of one customer’s workload impacting others.
* New monitoring dashboards and alerts were introduced to catch early signs of DB stress.
* Query performance metrics and background job load are now tracked in real time.
✅ Conclusion:
The degraded performance was the result of combined factors: inefficient auditing, aggressive archival processing, and sudden traffic spikes. With the applied optimizations, customer migration, and improved monitoring, the system has stabilized, and no further degradation has been observed. Continuous monitoring and preventive measures will ensure long-term reliability.